Sharpness was an interesting metric. I wonder if this also translated to his repertoire choices as well i.e. opting for more safe and manoeuvring position as time went on
The openings could be one reason but here I looked at the change in sharpness after each move. So even if the position is quiet, the sharpness change can be high when one tries to play for the win. But openings can still play a big part.
For Gukesh I plan to look at how his games changed since he became a GM. I think that it's interesting to see how his rise is reflected in accuracy and how his performance rating compared to his actual rating over the years.
Sharpness was an interesting metric. I wonder if this also translated to his repertoire choices as well i.e. opting for more safe and manoeuvring position as time went on
The openings could be one reason but here I looked at the change in sharpness after each move. So even if the position is quiet, the sharpness change can be high when one tries to play for the win. But openings can still play a big part.
how about Gukesh, any plan for a comparision?
For Gukesh I plan to look at how his games changed since he became a GM. I think that it's interesting to see how his rise is reflected in accuracy and how his performance rating compared to his actual rating over the years.